28/01/2026, hardwarebee
This page is for companies deciding whether to outsource FPGA development or build and maintain an in-house FPGA team.
Both models can work—but they solve very different problems. The wrong choice often leads to missed schedules, rising costs, or long-term technical debt.
When in-house FPGA development makes sense
Building FPGA capabilities internally is usually the right choice when:
In-house teams are best suited for platform-level ownership and long product lifecycles.
When outsourcing FPGA development makes sense
Outsourcing FPGA design is often the better option when:
Outsourced FPGA teams bring proven workflows, prior experience, and immediate execution capacity.
Cost, risk, and timeline comparison
In-house FPGA development
Outsourced FPGA development
Many teams underestimate the true cost and risk of first-time or infrequent FPGA development.
Hybrid models: the most common approach
Many successful teams use a hybrid model, where:
This approach combines control with speed and risk reduction.
How HardwareBee helps
HardwareBee helps you evaluate both options by connecting you with experienced FPGA design partners across multiple domains.
Through this page, you can:
You describe your situation once and get matched with relevant FPGA partners.
How it works
You decide whether to outsource fully, partially, or not at all.
Call to action
Evaluate your FPGA development approach
You do not need a final decision or specification—project scope, constraints, and timelines are enough to start.
Get matched with FPGA experts to evaluate outsourcing options here.